Home
[75%] 
Some data from this season if the suggested change was applied:
31 players would have saved 4 points from not conceding (meaning occurrence is rare, about 1.5 times per round of games)
Of the 31 players, 19 were backs, 6 were pm, 6 were forward (good breakdown for positional parity, given backs are currently least desirable of the 3).
Of the 31 players, there were 18 different players that benefited, and no player would have gained more than 8 points over the season due to the change (not massively skewed to any particular player or play style).
31 players would have saved 4 points from not conceding (meaning occurrence is rare, about 1.5 times per round of games)
Of the 31 players, 19 were backs, 6 were pm, 6 were forward (good breakdown for positional parity, given backs are currently least desirable of the 3).
Of the 31 players, there were 18 different players that benefited, and no player would have gained more than 8 points over the season due to the change (not massively skewed to any particular player or play style).